People have given me many reasons for their support of Obama, just about all of which make me more inclined to oppose him:
- His steady pursuit of "change," to the point of its becoming the #1 theme of his campaign. There is a lot about this country that I love and do not want to change. Perhaps some things need to be fixed, but I want most things about the U. S. to stay as they are!
- His popularity in Europe: Well, I'm sorry. One difference between the U. S. and Europe is the great popularity of socialism there. While in this country, even the Democratic Party, which favors a lot of socialistic ideas, denies anyone's characterization of it as a socialist party, in Europe, openly socialist parties thrive. And Obama's extreme-left ideas (endorsed by the New Party, after all!) would (not surprisingly) appeal to socialistically-inclined Europeans (and to those who, though perhaps not socialists themselves, are not as unalterably opposed to socialism as Americans are).
- This morning someone actually pointed to Obama's being a lawyer as a favorable thing. As if we do not already have enough lawyers in places of high power. One thing about lawyers is that they can argue in favor of anyone and anything, as long as it supports their client; no consideration to whether it's good for their city, state, or nation. That is not the kind of person I want to see leading the country!
- And of course, people like his youth and vigor. But this goes with a serious inexperience. Hey, four years ago the man was an obscure Illinois State Senator. And now he wants to be President of the United States? Most presidential candidates spend a bit more time as governors, United States Senators, corporate executives, or military leaders before trying for the highest office in the land. Is three years in the U. S. Senate enough? I think not.
I don't really intend to put it in every post between now and November, though I feel as if I should.
2 comments:
She sure does. Thanks!
Glad you read the post! I found yours when I was searching online to make sure I had Cato's name exactly right, though I had been planning to write it this way anyway -- like you, I believe in getting Latin correct and way back in 1959 I had insisted that a telegram that was sent by a team I belonged to say "Venimus, Vidimus, Vicimus" rather than "Veni, Vidi, Vici" since we were a team, not an individual.
Post a Comment