tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22250833.post2639095661992416537..comments2023-10-18T10:04:53.333-04:00Comments on Opinions and more: Why is freedom good — but exporting freedom bad?Opinionatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13332824650892306265noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22250833.post-54123378270857045412013-07-11T22:29:17.045-04:002013-07-11T22:29:17.045-04:00Yours is a totally libertarian point of view. And ...Yours is a totally libertarian point of view. And while I understand it, I can't subscribe to it. If private enterprise will not provide a good at a price people can afford, people may be deprived of a necessity simply because they do not have the funds. I imagine that this is acceptable to you, but it is not to me.Opinionatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13332824650892306265noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22250833.post-10164885759813191222013-07-11T19:58:18.819-04:002013-07-11T19:58:18.819-04:002 of your 3 stated principles are in error. The g...2 of your 3 stated principles are in error. The government has one function only: to provide the people with an environment that is free from force, so that they can live freely...it is not a govt function to provide goods that the people can't or won't provide themselves...the gov't has no place in industry... lincoln was totally wrong in his statement that gov't may provide goods if it can do so at a cheaper price...that would place the gov't in direct and unfair competition with private industry... read THE PROOF OF FREEDOM on thefrontiersmen.blogspot.com<br /> The nature of the human species requires that it be totally absolutely free. raynewmanStampeding Herdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15567324342927760171noreply@blogger.com